Benjamin Fulford Reports


Archived from the original on March 27,

10 Year Treasury Rate Historical Data


Er weist den Kurs zuzüglich Nettobardividende aus. Die Nettobardividende entspricht der Dividende abzüglich 30 Prozent Quellensteuer. Die Gewichtung erfolgt nach der Marktkapitalisierung der gelisteten Unternehmen.

Im Januar startete der Handel mit Index-Optionen, die weltweit zu den umsatzstärksten gehören. Er wurde erstmals veröffentlicht und bis zurückgerechnet. In den folgenden Jahren wurde dieser ständig erweitert.

Der erste täglich veröffentlichte Index erschien mit 90 Aktienwerten. Als Basisjahre für die Berechnung dienten die Jahre bis mit einem Startwert von zehn Indexpunkten. März mit 16,61 Prozent. Präsident der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika erlassen wurden. Der Börsenkrach breitete sich schnell auf alle wichtigen internationalen Handelsplätze aus. Oktober , schloss der Index mit ,88 Punkten wieder über seinem Niveau vor dem Börsenkrach. In den folgenden Jahren markierte der Index weitere Rekordstände.

Februar schloss der Index erstmals über der 1. März zum ersten Mal über der Grenze von 1. Oktober auf einen Tiefststand von ,76 Punkten. Das war ein Rückgang seit März um 49,1 Prozent. Oktober bedeutet das Ende der Talfahrt. Mai überschritt der Index mit einem Schlussstand von 1.

September die Marke von 1. Das Hoch von März fiel am Mai , als der Index den Handel mit 1. Davor waren auch ausländische Unternehmen, die an einer US-amerikanischen Börse gelistet waren im Index enthalten. Oktober schloss er mit ,23 Punkten erstmals seit dem September unter der Grenze von 1. September fiel der Index am 9. März , als er den Handel mit ,53 Punkten beendete. Seit dem Allzeithoch vom 9.

Oktober entspricht das einem Rückgang um 56,8 Prozent. März markiert den Wendepunkt der Talfahrt. April stieg er um ,6 Prozent auf einen Schlussstand von 1. Sie wandten sich gegen staatliche Regulierung der Wirtschaft, gegen die Höhe der Steuern, gegen den Umfang der Sozialhilfe und der öffentlichen Arbeitsbeschaffungsprogramme. Die Gesellschaft unterstützte auch eine rassistische Gruppe, die in den Südstaaten der USA Bilder verbreitete, auf denen die als Bürgerrechtlerin bekannte First Lady zusammen mit Afroamerikanern abgebildet war.

Butler Roosevelt informierte, stritt du Pont ab, etwas damit zu tun zu haben. Politisch einflussreich waren zu dieser Zeit insbesondere auch einige bisweilen als Populisten bezeichnete Persönlichkeiten.

Er warb für seinen Townsend Plan , der eine staatliche Altersrente für alle Bürger im Alter von über 60 Jahren vorsah. Dennoch konnte er für seine Petition 20 Millionen Unterstützer vorweisen. Der Plan war zwar fiskalisch so nicht durchführbar, die Gesellschaft hatte jedoch 7 Millionen Mitglieder, und es bestand kein Zweifel, dass Long eine Präsidentschaftskandidatur anstrebte. Andererseits zeigten sie, dass politische Konkurrenz nicht nur von den Konservativen zu befürchten war.

Dagegen spricht nach David M. Kennedy allerdings, dass die meisten Projekte bereits lange vor den Erfolgen der Populisten geplant und vorbereitet worden waren. Aufgrund der zeitlichen Perspektive könne lediglich der Wealth Tax Act als Antwort auf die Herausforderung durch die Populisten gesehen werden. Bis bestanden viele einzelne Sozialhilfeprogramme der Bundesländer zur Linderung der Armut, die mit Bundeszuschüssen aufgestockt wurden.

Öffentliche Rentenversicherungen gab es formell in einigen Bundesstaaten, sie waren aber ausnahmslos alle stark unterfinanziert und damit praktisch bedeutungslos. Das Fehlen einer Sozialversicherung machte die Vereinigten Staaten unter den modernen Industriestaaten zu einem Ausnahmefall.

Unter dieser Tatsache litten die Bürger während der Depression. Mit seiner Hilfe sollten die sozialen Probleme bewältigt werden. Weiterhin wurden Bundeszuschüsse zu den in Verwaltung der Einzelstaaten betriebenen Arbeitslosenversicherungen eingeführt. Zur Finanzierung wurde eine neue Steuer die Payroll tax eingeführt, mit der ein Arbeitgeberanteil und ein Arbeitnehmeranteil an die Staatskasse abgeführt wird.

Roosevelt hatte auf einer separaten Steuer bestanden, damit die Steuereinnahmen nicht für andere Zwecke genutzt werden können. Morgenthau berief sich darauf, dass die Sozialversicherungen unbezahlbar würden, wenn diese Bevölkerungsgruppen als typische Geringverdiener ebenfalls Versicherungsleistungen erhielten. Auch die Einführung einer öffentlichen Krankenversicherung war zunächst nicht mehrheitsfähig.

Roosevelt hoffte aber, dass der Social Security Act zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt erweitert werden könnte. Gewerkschaften gab es bereits lange vor Da die meisten Arbeitgeber Gewerkschaften nicht anerkannten, liefen Streiks oft gewaltsam ab, indem Streikende die Streikbrecher gewaltsam am Betreten der Fabrik hinderten und Arbeitgeber Schläger anheuerten, welche die Fabrik schützen und Streikende zerstreuen sollten.

Gelegentlich wurde auch die Polizei gegen Streikende eingesetzt bzw. Dabei kam es immer häufiger zu schweren Auseinandersetzungen mit vielen Verletzten und manchmal sogar Toten. Daraufhin riefen die lokalen Gewerkschaften einen Generalstreik aus, an dem sich Vor allem Robert F. Wagner drängte daher auf eine gesetzliche Anerkennung der Gewerkschaften.

Arbeiter durften seitdem nicht mehr wegen einer Gewerkschaftsmitgliedschaft entlassen werden. Auch ein formelles Streikrecht wurde eingeführt. Die Zahl der gewerkschaftlich organisierten Arbeiter verdoppelte sich von bis auf 7 Millionen.

Ford oder General Motors zurück, die sich bis dahin erfolgreich gegen Gewerkschaften gewehrt hatten. Weiterhin wurde Kinderarbeit von Kindern unter 16 Jahren verboten. Um das Gesetz durch den Kongress zu bringen, in dem Südstaaten-Abgeordnete eine entscheidende Fraktion bildeten, mussten Hausangestellte und Farmarbeiter vom Schutzbereich ausgenommen werden. Die Roosevelt Administration hoffte aber, den Anwendungsbereich des Gesetzes zu einem günstigeren Zeitpunkt später auch auf diese Berufsgruppen erweitern zu können.

Nach Erlass des Gesetzes erhöhten sich unmittelbar die Löhne von Er bezeichnete die Lage als Gleichgewicht bei Unterbeschäftigung. Keynes hatte mehrfach versucht, Roosevelt von einem Konjunkturstimulus durch Deficit spending zu überzeugen. Zu letzteren gehörte insbesondere der Finanzminister Henry Morgenthau. Bereits unter Hoover war eine deutliche Erhöhung der Einkommensteuer verabschiedet worden, welche die Staatseinnahmen erhöhte.

Zudem hatte Roosevelt bei Regierungsantritt deutliche Ausgabenkürzungen beispielsweise bei den Pensionen durchgesetzt Economy Act. Im Ergebnis betrug das Haushaltsdefizit des Bundeshaushalts von bis ca.

Schlesinger meint, der Brain Trust sei während des Second New Deal gegenüber der Idee einer keynesianischen Konjunkturpolitik aufgeschlossener gewesen als noch während des First New Deal. Kennedy bezweifelt das, eine solche Entwicklung lasse sich an der konkreten Politik kaum festmachen.

Roosevelt und sein Brain Trust kamen zu der Überzeugung, dass die Arbeitslosigkeit nicht wieder genauso schnell verschwinden würde, wie sie ausbrach. Damit wurde 3,5 Millionen arbeitsfähigen Arbeitslosen eine bezahlte Arbeit angeboten. Verantwortlich dafür waren neben der bereits gegründeten Public Works Administration seit vor allem die Works Progress Administration unter der Leitung von Harry Hopkins. Zum Beispiel dominierten einige wenige Holdinggesellschaften den gesamten Energiemarkt.

Zu dieser Zeit gab es in den Vereinigten Staaten viele pyramidenförmig organisierte, also mehrstufige Holdings. Hier musste der operative Teil der Gesellschaft exzessiv hohe Gewinne erwirtschaften, um die verschiedenen übergeordneten Gesellschaften zu finanzieren. Alle mehr als zweistufigen Holdinggesellschaften, die keine triftigen Gründe für diese Struktur nennen konnten, wurden zerschlagen. Finanzminister Morgenthau bezeichnete den Wealth Tax Act gegenüber Finanzbeamten als ein Wahlkampfdokument, ein Gesetz, das die Staatseinnahmen nur unwesentlich erhöhen sollte.

Im Kongress wurde das Gesetz abgeschwächt — kleinere Kapitalgesellschaften waren von den Regelungen weitgehend ausgenommen. Anders als bei dem Wealth Tax Act stand bei diesem Gesetz eine Erhöhung des Steuerertrags im Vordergrund, da der Kongress kurz zuvor auf eigene Initiative ein Gesetz verabschiedet hatte, das die Auszahlung der ausstehenden Bonuszahlungen für Veteranen des Ersten Weltkriegs — insgesamt 2 Milliarden Dollar — von auf vorzog.

Bei der Amtsübernahme durch Roosevelt war der Oberste Gerichtshof überwiegend mit Richtern auf Lebenszeit besetzt, die von republikanischen Präsidenten nominiert worden waren. In den er- und er-Jahren wurden vier der Richter am Obersten Gerichtshof als die Four Horsemen of Reaction bekannt, denen es immer wieder gelang, eine Mehrheit mindestens 5 der 9 Richter zu organisieren, mit der etliche progressive Gesetze für verfassungswidrig erklärt wurden.

Zu diesem Zeitpunkt hoffte Roosevelt noch, dass einer der Richter in Ruhestand gehen würde und die Mehrheitsverhältnisse durch eine neue Richternominierung geändert werden könnten. Nachdem weitere Gesetze, vor allem der Agricultural Adjustment Act und das Mindestlohngesetz des Bundesstaates New York, für verfassungswidrig erklärt wurden, kam Roosevelt zu der Überzeugung, dass der Oberste Gerichtshof alle wesentlichen Teile des New Deal kassieren würde und das Prinzip der Gewaltenteilung zwischen Judikative und Legislative zugunsten der Judikative faktisch unterlaufen wolle.

Auch der ehemalige Präsident Hoover kritisierte die Entscheidungen als einen zu weitgehenden Eingriff in legislative Kompetenzen. Mit der Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of sollte dem amerikanischen Präsidenten die Befugnis eingeräumt werden, für jeden über jährigen Richter, der sich weigerte, in Ruhestand zu gehen, zusätzliche neue Richter zu ernennen. Sie wurde aber von den Republikanern sowie von einigen demokratischen Abgeordneten als Eingriff in die Gewaltenteilung scharf kritisiert.

Richter Owen Roberts , der zuvor häufig mit den Four Horsemen gestimmt hatte, stimmte nun mit dem progressiven Flügel des Gerichts. Am deutlichsten wurde der Wechsel in der richterlichen Entscheidung, mit der das Mindestlohngesetz im Bundesstaat Washington für verfassungskonform erklärt wurde — nur ein Jahr zuvor war das Mindestlohngesetz von New York für verfassungswidrig erklärt worden. Kennedy geht davon aus, dass die zunehmende öffentliche Kritik an der Rechtsprechungspraxis der Four Horsemen of Reaction und der erdrutschartige Wahlsieg Roosevelts im November bei der Änderung der Rechtsprechung eine Rolle gespielt haben.

Nach der Phase konservativer Rechtsprechung begann im Jahr eine längere Phase liberaler Verfassungsrechtsprechung. William Rehnquist fasste den Verfassungswandel wie folgt zusammen:. Seit gab es keine Reformankündigungen mehr. Roosevelts Bestreben ging seitdem dahin, den New Deal zu verstetigen. Mit der Neubestimmung des Begriffs Liberal bezog er sich auf den Philosophen John Dewey , der bereits für ein neues Liberalismusverständnis plädiert hatte. Diese Neudefinition wurde in der politischen Diskussionen übernommen.

Seitdem wird Liberalismus in den Vereinigten Staaten weniger mit der Verteidigung unternehmerischer Freiheit, als mit einer arbeitnehmerfreundlichen Politik assoziiert.

In der Anfangszeit des New Deal war den Menschen nicht klar, ob es einen klaren demokratischen Weg jenseits von Kommunismus und Faschismus geben könnte. Dies veranlasste manche Kritiker dazu auch den New Deal dieser Tendenz zuzuordnen.

Johnson auch personelle Kontinuität bestand. Von Historikern werden Vorwürfe des Extremismus nicht geteilt. Der Faschismusforscher Stanley Payne kommt in A History of Fascism, — zu dem Ergebnis, dass die Idee des Faschismus nicht in die Vereinigten Staaten ausstrahlte und in den USA vorhandene präfaschistische Aspekte, wie etwa Rassismus, während der er in ihrer Bedeutung eher ab statt zunahmen.

Historiker haben zwei wesentliche Gründe für die in der zweiten Welle der Red Scare resultierenden Angriffe eines Teils der Konservativen gegen Liberale ausgemacht.

Zum einen war dies die überwältigende Popularität von Franklin D. Roosevelt und der in der Bevölkerung plötzlich aufgetretene Enthusiasmus für Staatsinterventionismus , die in einer kontinuierlichen demokratischen Mehrheit in dem Kongress resultierte. Zum anderen mussten Konservative hilflos zusehen, wie sich die sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Verhältnisse des Landes innerhalb weniger Jahre stark veränderten, was sie als zutiefst schockierend empfanden.

Denn viele Konservative befürworteten eine Freie unregulierte Marktwirtschaft und sahen Staatseingriffe in die Wirtschaft als Sündenfall an. Dewey solche Präsidentschaftskandidaten, welche dem New Deal nicht feindlich gegenüberstanden. Eisenhower , der auch als gewählter Präsident zu dem allgemeinen New-Deal-Konsens stand. In einem privaten Brief erklärte er seinen Standpunkt wie folgt:. There is a tiny splinter group of course, that believes you can do these things … Their number is negligible and they are stupid.

Es gibt natürlich eine kleine Splittergruppe die glaubt derartiges tun zu können … Ihre Anzahl ist jedoch vernachlässigbar und sie sind dumm. Auch unter dem republikanischen Präsidenten Eisenhower erfolgte eine Ausweitung der Sozialversicherungen und eine Erhöhung des Mindestlohns. Unter den demokratischen Präsidenten John F. One needs to study these things to even begin to comprehend the REAL issues of what we are dealing with and what opportunities are presented to us and what REAL problems do we face as Humanity, some of which are immense in their complexity.

But they are happening in such a way as to minimize the probabilities of catastrophic consequences of some probable events and actions. The "future" is not determinable from the present, like in some deterministic machine.

It is not mapped as some "inevitability" from the "present". There are what is known "probable alternatives" to what may happen "in the future". And the number of those alternatives is virtually infinite. It all depends on the point of view. From one point of view, doing so and so might look to be the most beneficial or most "efficient" course of action. But from a different point of view, it may turn out to be nothing but disaster and destruction of all kinds.

So, how could the "blind", not "seeing" even the skin-deep levels for what they are, "lead the mankind" to anything other than "hell", as it is commonly known? So, let us look as some elements of "the plan to save this planet" as proposed by Benya Fulford and the WDS. Network of interconnected organizations Invisible Khazaria by Tatyana Gracheva, Algorithms and geopolitical strategy of secret wars of the world behind the scenes.

Yes, it is at least conceivable that Benya is genuinely trying to do his best to assist as many people in understanding the mechanisms of evil. Yes, it can not be excluded that even his wild exaggerations and inventions are merely an attempt to look at probable outcomes of the world's major events. Yes, it is at least conceivable that he is "running out of his skin" trying to help as many people to SEE what is going on behind the curtains and he deserves the "thank you" for that, if that is the case.

But the question still remains: But What does money have to do with this? The thing is that those who are honest and are not merely interested in parasiting on the fruits of someone's labor, and who are genuinely interested in his writing will pay for it, merely out of appreciation, respect for the work he has done and in support of his efforts.

But the parasites or those in doubt or those, who are concerned with the issues of "identification of undesirables", not even mentioning all those, who simply can not afford to pay, will not pay no matter what you do. All, that has to be done is to tell the parasites that the Laws and principles of Life state: You will pay, one way of the other, sooner or later.

For this is the Law, Law of Life, nothing less. Furthermore, it is utterly futile, if not idiotic, to extrapolate "how much money I COULD make if everyone paid for my writings". Because those are nothing but the pipe dreams and wishful thinking or mere manipulations of reality. Finally, here's one last word for Benya and his likes, of which there are plenty on the net nowadays, with all sorts of "revelations" and "messages" of all kinds, also charging money on a subscription basis for allegedly telling you the Truth, presenting themselves as all sorts of "channels" and "messengers" for the Light Side:.

The Truth is not for sale. It can not be bought, no matter how much money you throw at it and how much "power" and "influence" you have and how much blood you had to spill in your never ending thirst for "dust, falling into dust". After reading the ugly guilt manipulation and threatening message of Benya, which is quite a piece of "art" in terms of manipulation, we have also been contacted by one of those "bleeding heart" kind of guys, which, on the surface, was appealing to our "humaneness" and "give him a break, he is just human".

On the top of it, this individual had even guts to end his message with " And this response is made not necessarily to him, but to all those of his kind, and largely because of that last statement of his, that has a profound significance, at least when told by someone who can SEE. Except that we are aware of a different version of it: So, here is his message:.

I like getting Bens reports on a monday for free even if they can be fanciful sometimes but look, he does deserve to earn a living and I'm sure he is not getting rich of his reports.

You can quote the law over and over all you want and there are probably dozens of loopholes but human being to human being, Ben deserves some reward for his reports and you know that. Just like you deserve energy returned to you for what you do. Posting 3 days later is not exactly Naiz - you you fucking can't post at all and I think it's pretty fair.

The first thing to mention in response is "I like getting Bens reports on a monday for free". But the question is WHY do you STILL like to get them for free, and, therefore, would rather not pay even though you obviously find them of some value to you? Would you also like to get some food from the supermarket for free? You see, this simply indicates your deepermost disrespect for creativity. Even to conceive the idea "I like getting Bens reports How can such an idea of "getting something for free" even arise in the mind of a honest human being that appreciates Life and Creativity when he is getting something of value, which is a fruit of creation of someone else?

As to "but look, he does deserve to earn a living", the answer is simple: How one must feel telling all sorts of things to others while, at the same time, knowing full well that very little of it is verifiable and much, if not most of it, is nothing more than wishful thinking projections, at best? As to "I'm sure he is not getting rich of his reports", the response is simple: Do you have any supporting evidence of your "sure"?

How could you possibly know? You see, the very fact that he can afford to go on some vacation, right in the middle of the battle against the evil, as he claims, means what?

And where does he get the money for all his trips to the Vatican, Rome, to see David Rockefeller and all sorts of other "influential" individuals? Just his travel expenses alone might turn out to be more than any "ordinary" human being, "just making a buck", can afford.

And what does "getting rich" have to do with Truth and his alleged efforts to fight evil? As to "You can quote the law over and over all you want and there are probably dozens of loopholes but human being to human being, Ben deserves some reward for his reports and you know that", our response is simple enough: And his very "message" ends precisely with a threat of a legal nature. It is one thing to be deluded in one's own mind, because one bears the consequences of his own actions.

But deluding the people and thus "lead them astray" is something utterly different and the consequences are much more severe for doing so. Furthermore, his disclaimer note, where he releases himself from any responsibility for the information he provides, changes nothing as far as the consequences go.

As to "Just like you deserve energy returned to you for what you do", to tell you the truth, the very word "deserve" does not even appear on our radar screen as far as the results of work we do.

We do not do it just to get some praises or adoration. We are what we are. And we do what we do not because of any kinds of "rewards" that could be measured in material "values" or ego gratification procedures. But because it simply MUST be done in our opinion, and that does not imply that our opinion is "right".

But we DO see the fruits indeed and that means to us that one more human Soul has awakened to Truth and reality of it. We can only say "thank you", oh that Power that had found a way to use the fruits of our labor to awaken one more Soul on this planet. We need no other "rewards". The very Joy and a smile and peace in our Souls is about the highest "reward" we can even imagine. Furthermore, we have not received a penny for all the work we have done, and have NEVER even asked for a penny.

The very idea is simply not of our concern. We DO receive all the Grace and all the daily necessities, that are of the most simple kind, on the par with a poor man. But that is ALL we need. And finally, as to "Then again you play it the way you want to but remember one thing - don't lie to yourself -", yes, this is EXACTLY true, and that is one of the most significant things in this entire chapter.

If you don't mind, let us tell you what it means to US. It means that deep inside of you you know and see things in a particular way, which constitute your deepermost understanding and beliefs. But on the surface, when you relate to others, you are saying things that are different from what you yourself believe in the depths of your being. Now, as far as WE are concerned, what do you know and can possibly know about our deepermost "secrets" and beliefs and opinions?

And, in order to accuse us of lying to ourselves, you at least need to state what ARE those lies or the moments where you think what we say is not what we deeply understand? Let me repeat one more time: Who knows, may be one day, you might discover that the left part of your mouth is not saying the same thing as the right part, not even mentioning that, which lays deep within you, and that is quite a discovery. Walk with this idea morning to night. Who knows what might happen.

Well, one thing is certain, Benya seems to be really interested to get our attention with his guilt projection and fear instillation tricks. After we have been contacted by one individual and looked at Benya's threats, the initial feeling was of utter disgust, to the point that one has an urge to vomit, so sick and perverted the whole thing seemed to us at the time. Why should we even argue about the authors? We either carry them or we don't. We have never argued with any author, at least about the issues of publication.

This, by itself, looks like something on the par with insane. One of this author's friends told him once: They get what they deserve". Well, certainly, he has a point, and a big one at that. Basically, I do it because I simply can not do otherwise, and it isn't even some moral or ethical consideration. For one thing, despite all the idiocy I have seen, I simply do not believe that people are as dumb as they pretend to be.

Basically, the problem of blindness is not a result of some inherent inability of people to SEE. It is their deep fear that if they even look at something honestly and sincerely, then, somehow, the entire structure of their belief system of myths of all kinds will simply collapse. On the other hand, even if a few people will be able to see as a result of what we do, then it is worth to us more than can be imagined by many.

Because every single individual whose eyes open becomes like a spark that can fire up many things. The other pretty ugly part of his threats and all the negative energy projected by the "bleeding hearts" and other members of his "elite club" of "the chosen few", who have the financial and technical abilities to pay for his reports, is that he begins to dictate some "rules" to nothing less than Creativity and Truth, and that is not such a good idea, and it has some consequences, some of which Benya can not even begin to comprehend it seems.

At the roots of it lay a pretty ordinary megalomania and narcissism. Usually, it is tightly coupled with what is known as degeneracy in medical terms. Degeneracy, is tightly coupled with psychiatric disorders, when one somehow "looses it" and begins to confuse the real and unreal and takes purely imagined and at times quite "twisted" or "stretched" and distorted versions as something ultimately real. Degeneracy, in turn, begins with sexual perversions, which Gregory Klimov calls "the first bell of nature", just as Benya himself had reported having the "unusual sex" with one lady.

The roots of sexual perversions lay in dullness and denial, thus, insatiable desire for more and more sex. Eventually, it becomes dull and one no longer experiences the orgasmic culmination during the plain ordinary intercourse. So, "naturally", they begin to stretch the limits of what is sex. Thus, sex becomes perverted. Initially, it could be the same sex partners, and then, as it "grows", it becomes sadism and eventually sadomasochism, and masochism is the worst and most vicious form of sadism.

If one does not pay attention to this sickness, then "the second bell of nature" comes in form of mental diseases, and if one keeps denying this sickness and keeps pushing it further, then "the third and final bell of nature" comes in form of birth defects.

Birth defects mean that the Nature simply terminates this particular branch on the tree and this bloodline. From then on, this branch simply withers away and can no longer produce any fruits. Very few degenerates on the third level have either desire or are capable of producing the offspring.

This is how Gregory Klimov, one of the world's foremost experts on degeneracy and Higher Sociology, presents the entire process and the roots of it. But this has to be studied and the results will be simply shocking to most. You can review an interview with Gregory Klimov that outlines the most essential things as far as degeneracy and "the power complex" go.

It is not an exhaustive coverage of all the issues involved, but, nevertheless, it might shock your minds if you even begin to comprehend the significance of it and the impact they have on everyone on this planet. Three stages of degeneracy Degenerates Rule The World! Interview with Gregory Klimov about "the power complex" and stages, symptoms and expressions of degeneracy.

Unfortunately, Gregory Klimov is one of the most taboo authors you can find. Out of his 7 books only one has been translated into English. The utterly secret field of Higher Sociology discloses the very roots and mechanisms of that which Benya attempts to deal with. In particular, the concept of "the power complex" or insatiable desire to "rule" others and impose ones own will upon them is covered in the most profound detail.

So, all these "demons" Benya is trying to "fight", at least as he presents it, and their very motivations can be understood only if you are aware of the deepermost details and the very core of their twisted belief system. Benya, with all due respect for his work, and some of it is quite insightful, does not seem to have the real grasp on the underlying issues, nor he has those necessary keys that "open the doors" to this most profound riddle in the entire history of this planet.

Yes, he does know some things and has some intuitive grasp of it, and probably more than many others, but still he looks like one of those "blind ones", groping in the darkness of evil without having the sufficiently solid base to stand upon, and it's been said: And, to our opinion, Benya's "house" is precisely built on sand.

Yes, he waves his hands a lot and shouts all sorts of slogans and makes all sorts of proclamations and even "prophecies" of sorts.

But most of it is nothing more than "a tale, told by an idiot, full of fury, signifying nothing". In order to "fight the evil" you need to SEE it, to SEE its very roots and foundation, to see and understand its "operating principles" and the entire system of belief, and, probably most importantly, to see that hand, which rules it all in this grand puppet theater.

That is the difference between the "heaven" and the "hell". Else, one is simply doomed in face of the most powerful forces in the entire history of mankind. Yes, one can see some puppets indeed. But unless one can see the puppet master and understand his very roots and underlying ideology and its "goals", one has virtually no chance to "win" this battle.

Now, these are the very roots of what is known as evil. Eventually, these people get so confused that they begin to imagine that they can set some "rules" to anything they want. Because, deep inside, they are the followers of what is known as "negative approach to development of Intelligence". The essence of the "negative approach" is self-serving and totally ignoring the needs and interests of others. And that is precisely why one "looses it" in the most profound terms and even begins to set some "rules" to anything he pleases, not even realizing that some things are simply beyond his control, regardless of what he thinks or does.

And the indication of the fact that they did indeed "loose it" is the fact that they begin to set some rules even to some of the highest principles of the Infinite Multidimensional Intelligence, such as Creativity, going to the point of delusion where they even begin to set some "rules" to nothing else that Truth and place some conditions on it.

At that point, it becomes basically "a mental department level", meaning they have lost the most fundamental guideposts on their way.

One needs to open up a bit and realize ones own relative significance "in the scheme of things", and that is development of Intelligence, and place oneself into a proper perspective, simply by realizing that one is NOT "the greatest thing or entity ever known to mankind". In could be just the other way around in at least some aspects. And that is precisely why it was said: All that you think is great treasures you have in your hands, that you have managed to grab, is dust and nothing but the dust.

First of all, we have no interest in being the only ones that make his reports available to the whole world without any artificial delays or strings attached, even though we disagree, and for fundamental reasons, with the idea of not providing the information openly and unconditionally.

We are not quite interested to play the role of Jesus Christ in the game of "saving the world". That is not the role we chose to play. It is our opinion that Humanity can not be "saved" by some "noble knights on the white horse". Humanity needs "saving" itself, or, more precisely, to drastically increase the degree of awareness of every individual, and that happens purely on individual level, upon ones own individual initiative, desire and interest to do so.

It can not be imposed from the outside, even though plenty of assistance is available upon "calling", which is already happening as we speak. It won't work, it never worked and it can not possibly work. Because if one refuses to SEE, just as been said in the New Testament, for example, then he will remain blind and will not learn anything he is not interested in learning. Learning and "SEEING" is a result of internal desire to do so in order to progress or refine the level of ones own consciousness and come to the point where one can "SEE", at least the most essential things.

Secondly, in all the years we have been operating our sites, not a single author had ever placed ANY conditions regarding his work, as to how and why and in which form we chose to publish it.

We publish things in a particular visual format to facilitate the clarity and simplicity of perception and to allow one to process and digest massive amounts of information. No fancy pictures, no bells and whistles, to make sure there are no hindrances and distractions of any kind. And, nevertheless, if anything, we have seen quite some compliments by some of the REAL researchers and of the world caliber that indicate to us that they do find this work of value, to the point that some of them even begin to promote it, and not necessarily for the purposeful promotion.

Thirdly, fortunately or unfortunately, there is quite a few pretty subtle and yet far reaching things said in his reports and for the purposes yet to be determined, that might have a pretty significant impact in terms of distortions of all kinds. Now, there are many people who still did not study these subjects of evil to the extent that is necessary for them to SEE the whole picture. And, knowingly or unknowingly, whatever Benya says may have quite some consequences as far as their understanding, distortions of all kinds, and further probable actions go.

So, if there is ANY chance that we might help to unscramble, comprehend or even understand some of those quite subtle things, that might not be noticed by those, who did not do enough study of it, then that is what we will try to do. Whether we are "right" or "wrong" or our interpretations are "correct", let the people decide for themselves.

But at least they have a chance to look at it all from a different perspective, and we do not usually comment on those things, where we do not have a sufficient or necessary competence or a certain degree of seeing the essence of it.

At least some of it, and quite conceivably, might be done without him even being aware of it and the consequences that it might have. We chose not to comment previously on all those questionable things that we found in his reports, some of which could be considered the deliberate perversions, at least if done with "bad intent". Whether it is so, "time will tell", and it will, definitely so. But, in light of this all, we started considering our options as to how to handle Benya's reports and his demands, and there are few of those options available indeed.

And the "problem" we have is that these reports need to be addressed simply because he has too wide of a following and too much of an impact, at least on the minds of not very competent people, who did not study the issues deep enough to even begin to comprehend what we are dealing with here.

Unfortunately, most of the options we have involve some additional work on our part and treatment of his information differently from how we treat and handle all other information on our sites, and that might cost something not only to us, but to him as well.

So, the fist option we have, is to say: OK, dear Benya, we will honor your quite unusual request to delay the publication of information. Yes, we do not like the very idea of a "special treatment" to any information or authors on our sites.

Our hands are full as is. We do not need any additional load and extra work to be done just because of some Benya with questionable reputation and all sorts of unverifiable information he constantly publishes. This implies that instead of publishing his reports as soon as we have a chance to see them, we will honor his request and, instead of publishing his reports in full, which, among other things, is necessary for historical reference purposes, we might instead publish the digests of his reports and delay the publication of full versions for three days as he requested.

And we warn Benya that this is probably the worst thing he could even imagine for himself. Simply because we may attempt to expose "the real meaning" and some of those nasty hidden aspects, as we perceive it, of what he says and let everyone have a look at even those things that we have chosen not to comment on previously for various reasons. Yes, "expose the real meaning" does not mean some "revelations" of absolute and undeniable essence of it, but simply means in OUR opinion.

We make no big claims as to the guarantees of validity of what and how we see things. To different people, the "real meaning" might be quite different, but that is "the nature of things". Fundamentally, the "hidden meaning" is available only on the highest levels of Intelligence, even though some things are available to anyone upon sincere asking and honest intent, or what is known as "calling".

In our understanding, the sincere "calling" may be answered by the higher levels, but only if it does not interfere with the individual's own free will and free choice. Simply telling you some "answer", without your own sincere investigation and desire to know, is not likely to change the degree of your awareness, knowing or, rather, SEEING. Yes, it is quite a bit of additional work that we might have to do with this approach, and this is not exactly the kind of work we would otherwise chose to do, being as busy as we are with what we already have on our hands.

But what to do, especially in the situation where you might be left as one of the very few in the entire world who has guts to publish his reports as soon as they come out and facing the consequences of "explaining yourself"? One more aspect of Benya's reports is the fact that they might be of interest to some REAL information warfare fighters, or "the messengers of Truth" as they are known to some. Now, one of the principles of the information warfare, especially when you fight no one less but evil all-pervading, is that you can not dictate ANYTHING to those, who have chosen to fight.

Because they are fighting, or, more precisely, STAND for, nothing less than Truth and they are responsible to only the highest levels of Intelligence and Life force as such. And, at least some of them, fully realize that they stake nothing less than their own Lives in this standoff with the evil most profound. So, there is no one in this world who can dictate anything to them.

They are willing to pay whatever price there is, even if they make some "mistakes" that are inevitable in pretty much anything anyone does or thinks. And their fight is not meant to cause some chaos and violence of all kinds. Yes, no one can force SEEING on anyone else, and even if they try to, it will most likely be violence against the will of those, who are "blind" at the moment.

Because the real reasons they are "blind" is because they are not READY to see anything beyond what they already know, or, more precisely, programmed with.

Krishnamurti during one of his interviews has told a reporter asking him all sorts of utterly meaningless and even foolish things:. And that is quite an insight. Just observe yourselves and see the REAL reasons for you to ask something of someone. Are you asking because you are really interested to know something that is different from what you already know?

Or just to support that, which you already know? Because knowledge of something genuinely new for you is that, which endangers your "same old, same old". In new, you have no guarantee that your "same old" will remain safe and your ego and "self-image" are not challenged. So, this war is not a war of violence and destruction or some grandiose images of ego gratification.

One thing we know with certainty is that PLENTY of people would prefer to get Benya's reports "as soon as they come out of the oven", without any strings attached and without being identified. So, why is he trying to twist their arms and submit to his "rules"? Is he some kind of a king or emperor to create ANY kind of "rules" to nothing less than Truth itself? It is at least conceivable that the reason why Benya so insists on people registering with him in order to have unhindered and immediate access to information has NOTHING to do with money.

But it might be done simply for the purposes of identification of "undesirables". Some people already know that there exists 3 lists in the NWO scheme. The "red list" is the list of either "dissidents" or otherwise "undesirables" or "potential troublemakers".

Those, who get on the "red list" are to be exterminated first. There are over FEMA concentration camps already built in the USA alone and there are hundreds of thousands of caskets already manufactured to store at least 3 bodies in each one.

At the point of "trigger event", those people are to be immediately arrested, without any court decisions, and are to be transported into the concentration camps with efficient gas and body burning chambers and so on. At this junction, this "trigger event" may happen ANY moment. ALL the necessary executive directives to bypass the law and the constitution have already been signed by the presidents Bush and Obama, just as described, for example, by Alex Jones and few others.

How many of you are aware of the "Project Endgame", secretly signed by Obama a few years ago? Here is a little quote on that:.

Now, how much certainty can you possibly have that this very Benya is not going to provide the ID information about you if he is either bribed or threatened? All this means is that about the worst idea the real worrier might imagine is to register and thus expose the exact information about himself to anyone. Most of the information worriers even know that participating in any kind of "social media" schemes is the easiest and surest way to get on the "red list", not even mentioning the fact that their entire brain contents becomes totally open to the powers of evil that control and own all these so-called "social media" outlets.

One must be a hopeless fool to doubt that these outlets will provide ANY and FULL information on them, including every single post they have made or read and every single email they have ever sent of received, which means what in your opinion?

There is also a substantial class of worriers who simply can not obtain any reports on the paying basis, even if they wanted to, and for numerous reasons. It is our opinion that no person, regardless of where he lives on this planet, how much income or equipment does he have, should be deprived of ANY information about the evil or anything else for that matter and without any delays regardless of anything.

Even if Benya's reports are largely fakes and fabrications of wishful thinking, at best, one still should have the ability to access them unconditionally. For example, some people are willing and have the abilities to provide any additional information even if it is not available on the sites.

At this junction there exists a mechanism of getting the extended version of the site and the entire collection of information via BTSync program. This means that if someone is interested in Benya's information, but is not able or willing to either pay or be identified, then install the BTSync program and create a folder for extended real-time collection.

See further instruction here:. Download and automatically update the extended version of http: In light of Benya's legal threats regarding the release of his information without delays and no string attached, let us look at what is he charging money for in his alleged "fight to save the world".

Who knows, some people might even start asking the questions of a kind: Am I just a fool, ready to swallow "hook, line and sinker" anything that some "authority" throws me? Netanyahu and other senior nazionists to be arrested soon. Mind you, that was said more than a year ago, on July 21, Furthermore, the "sources" are nothing less than Mossad. And if Mossad does not know what is going on "under the hood" then who would know better? Have any of you heard even of traces of Netanyahu and other ZioNazis being arrested or even condemned even after a year since these "revelations"?

So, how many years and generations will it take before these "prophecies" are going to materialize in reality? For this reason, the possibility is growing that Abe will be arrested on terror charges when he goes to Davos, Switzerland for the Cabal meeting starting there on January 21, the sources in Chinese, British, Japanese and American intelligence agencies say.

Was he in fact arrested and have you heard even any mentioning of his arrest anywhere? Just imagine the following scenario if you wish. You simply call Benya and tell him that you are an agent of such and such intelligence agency and you have the information he might be interested in. The thing is, there is no way for Benya to know if you are real or not.

Because it is clear to both of you that you can not identify yourself or disclose your code name. So, it is foolish for him to even ask you to identify yourself, even if he uses some secondary means. Then you tell Benya anything you wish or find something really noteworthy published somewhere and you tell Benya that YOU are the actual "source".

Now, what do you expect to happen as a result if not Benya publishing your utter disinformation garbage claiming "according to our 'source' in such and such intelligence agency, we can tell you this:

Copyright © 2017 · All Rights Reserved · Maine Council of Churches